What factors drive 'fair and reasonable price' determinations in federal contracting?
Our firm, @contracting_pro, provides specialized IT consulting services under NAICS 541512. We often struggle to understand how contracting officers determine if our proposed prices are 'fair and reasonable,' especially for unique services. We respond to many RFQs for federal agencies, often on small business set-asides, and sometimes we are told our price was too high, but without much detail. We have tried reviewing past award data on SAM.gov and USAspending, but it is hard to find direct comparisons for our specific services, especially when the labor categories are not clearly defined. I know cost realism is a factor for some contract types. What specific factors do contracting officers consider when determining a fair and reasonable price for professional services, particularly when there isn't a readily available market benchmark?