We're bidding on a large federal Request for Proposal (RFP) for IT services, NAICS 541519, due in three weeks. This is a full and open competition, and the past performance section feels like it will make or break our bid. The Section L instructions are pretty vague, just asking for "relevant and recent past performance." Section M mentions that the government will assess "the quality and relevance of past performance." We've been told to focus on projects similar in scope and complexity. We have a few good projects that fit, but I'm struggling with how to structure the volume to really highlight our strengths. What are the best practices for developing a strong past performance volume for a large federal RFP, especially when the instructions are not very prescriptive?
What are best practices for developing a strong past performance volume for a large RFP?
Ask a question1 answer
For a federal Request for Proposal (RFP) like this one, you need to structure your past performance volume to clearly show relevance to the specific requirements of the current solicitation. When Section L is vague, you should still assume the contracting officer wants to see how your past work directly applies to their needs in Section M.
Focus on projects that match the size, scope, complexity, and technical requirements outlined in the RFP's Statement of Work or Performance Work Statement. For each project, provide a concise summary, key personnel involved, the client, contract value, and a narrative explaining how that experience demonstrates your ability to perform the current requirement. Always include points of contact for the client so they can be reached for verification. If your past projects used similar technology or delivered similar outcomes, emphasize those connections. Remember, the government will prepare CPARS evaluations for each contract and each order that exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, so those are the kinds of records they are used to reviewing.