govcon.forum

How do you decide bid or no-bid when you cannot tell if an RFP is wired for the incumbent?

Ask a question
Asked Active Viewed 0 timesQuestion
3answers

I'm looking at a state agency Request for Proposal (RFP) for IT services, specifically 541511, and trying to decide on a bid or no-bid. The incumbent has held this contract for nine years, and the RFP specifies a particular software solution that the incumbent uses. This looks like a "wired" RFP, but the agency says it's an open competition. The deadline is three weeks out.

My business development team says we should go for it, but I'm worried about spending three weeks of proposal writing for a contract that might already be decided. What signals do you look for in an RFP that suggest it might be wired for an incumbent? How do you decide whether to pursue it?

asked Keisha W. Verified vendor8(a) firm founder, staffing and training · Atlanta, GA · 201 rep

3 answers

4

When an RFP appears to favor an incumbent, you need to weigh the time and resources you will invest against the likelihood of a fair evaluation. The state agency's specification of a particular software solution that the incumbent uses is a strong signal that the RFP might be wired. For federal procurements, this type of specification would be scrutinized under FAR Part 6, Competition Requirements, which generally prohibits specifications that unduly restrict competition. State and local procurements follow their own procurement codes, which often have similar principles. Your decision to bid should consider if the agency has a legitimate, documented need for that specific software, or if they are simply accustomed to the incumbent's solution. If you cannot meet the specific software requirement or offer a demonstrably superior alternative that the agency would reasonably consider, then the investment of three weeks for proposal writing is likely not worthwhile. I look at how narrowly defined the requirements are, how short the response time is, and whether the past performance requirements are tailored to only one vendor. If you still want to pursue it, consider submitting questions during the Q&A period to challenge the proprietary specification and request an amendment to broaden the scope.

answered Nadia F. Verified vendorWOSB owner, management consulting · Minneapolis, MN · 478 rep
This is a great point about asking questions during the Q&A period. I've seen it work for city contracts when they were asking for specific equipment that only one vendor carried. · Jordan P. ·
3

A bid bond is a tool that can reveal if an RFP is wired for an incumbent. The bid bond protects the government if the low bidder fails to sign the contract. If the low bidder backs out, the government can claim the difference between the low bid and the next low bid from the bid bond. The bid bond amount is typically set at 5 percent of the bid price. If the agency specifies a bid bond, it means they are serious about getting a signed contract from the winning bidder.

answered Tom B. Construction estimator, public works · Phoenix, AZ · 225 rep
2

Your bid or no-bid decision should start with a thorough analysis of the RFP against your firm's capabilities and the competitive landscape. Nadia is right that specific software solutions can be a red flag, but sometimes an agency has a legitimate need for interoperability or standardization. I look at the entire RFP for restrictions beyond just software, such as highly specific personnel requirements or unusually restrictive past performance criteria that only the incumbent could meet. If you decide to pursue it, engage in shaping activities by submitting a strong Request for Information (RFI) response or a sources sought notice response before the RFP drops, highlighting your alternative solutions and their benefits.

answered Priya S. Verified vendorCapture manager, IT services · Herndon, VA · 225 rep

Your answer

Sign up to answerCite the FAR clause or procurement code where you can.