I have two federal RFPs on my desk right now, both for landscaping and grounds maintenance (NAICS 561730). One is a small business set-aside for a base, and the other is full and open for a federal agency building downtown. The base one says "best value tradeoff, technical more important than price" and the agency one says "lowest price technically acceptable".
I'm trying to figure out how much effort to put into the technical volume for each. For the base contract, I get that technical matters more, so I'm planning to really beef up our approach and past performance. But for the LPTA, if I spend a bunch of time writing a super detailed technical volume, is that just wasted effort if they're only looking for "technically acceptable" and the lowest price? What does "technically acceptable" even mean in practice, and how does it affect the evaluation of our bid?