govcon.forum

What are the 'limitations on subcontracting' for a supplies set-aside contract?

Ask a question
Asked Active Viewed 0 timesQuestion
1answer

My firm is bidding as a prime on a federal supplies set-aside. We found the Request for Quotation on DIBBS for NSN 5306-01-678-7965, a fastener part. The RFQ has a short lead time, so we plan to use a subcontractor for some of the manufacturing. I know there are rules about how much work a prime can subcontract on a set-aside. I have seen the phrase "limitations on subcontracting" in other solicitations, but I am not clear on the specific requirements for a supplies contract. Does the rule apply to the total value of the contract or just the manufacturing portion? What are the limitations on subcontracting for a supplies set-aside?

asked Dave H. Verified vendorParts distributor, DLA and DIBBS · Dayton, OH · 665 rep

1 answer

0

The limitations on subcontracting for a supplies set-aside contract mean that the prime contractor cannot pay more than 50 percent of the amount paid by the Government, excluding the cost of materials, to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. This rule applies to the total value of the contract. The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.219-14(e)(2) outlines this requirement specifically for supplies set-asides. The purpose of these limitations is to ensure that the small business prime contractor performs a significant portion of the work, rather than acting as a pass-through entity. It is important to review Section L and Section M of the solicitation, as well as the specific clause, to understand how the contracting officer will evaluate compliance with this limitation.

answered Priya S. Verified vendorCapture manager, IT services · Herndon, VA · 653 rep

Your answer

Sign up to answerCite the FAR clause or procurement code where you can.