For a WOSB set-aside, a joint venture can offer shared liability and stronger past performance, while a prime-sub relationship provides more control and less administrative burden.
A joint venture creates a new legal entity, which means both companies share in the profits and losses and are jointly and severally liable for contract performance. This structure can also combine the past performance and capabilities of both WOSBs, potentially strengthening the bid for a larger contract. However, forming a joint venture involves significant legal and administrative effort, including drafting an operating agreement and managing the new entity's finances and operations. The SBA Mentor-Protege Program allows for an approved joint venture between a protege and its mentor to be treated as a small business for any government contract as long as the protege is small for the NAICS code and the joint venture meets other requirements.
In a prime-sub relationship, the prime contractor holds the primary contractual responsibility and liability. The subcontractor performs a specific portion of the work. This approach is generally simpler to set up and manage, as it does not require forming a new legal entity. The prime maintains more control over the project and the subcontractor's role. However, the prime bears most of the risk. The limitations on subcontracting still apply, meaning the prime cannot pay more than 50 percent of the amount received from the Government to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities for services contracts (FAR 52.219-14(e)(1)).